A recent case before the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) brought into focus a growing phenomenon that small business owners should keep in mind for work-related or business expense deduction claims, especially where the acquisition of claimable assets is made in a certain way. peer sourced assets, and the realities of making a claim The case involved a taxpayer’s attempt to make a claim for the cost of work-related tools that he bought through the classified ad and community exchange site Gumtree. The online buy-and-sell site has enjoyed increasing usage since it launched in 2007, and has seen an expansion of the range of items listed on its pages beyond the proverbial spare bookcase or cheap bicycle.
In the case concerned, an engineer allegedly bought a set of very expensive aircraft maintenance tools he found on Gumtree for which he paid about $25,000 (apparently a bargain for the sort of tools concerned).
The seller provided an “invoice” of sorts, that merely listed his contact details and a description of the tools, which was handwritten on a sheet of paper. Not only this, but the engineer paid cash that he said was made possible by way of gambling winnings, and which he kept at home (and no, we don’t have the address).
The ATO had already looked at the “invoice” details, and found that the contact details were false. There was also no evidence of the cash involved, either coming in from a lucky night at the casino or going out, and also no evidence of the existence of the tools apart from the handwritten description (the engineer had since “sold” them in a similar manner).
You can probably guess that the AAT, after a figurative roll of the eyes, disallowed the engineer’s claim for the cost of the tools as a tax deduction. (You can read all the details of the AAT case here.)
The take away from the whole sorry saga however, and the warning to be inferred from it, is the substantiation difficulties that can be encountered when buying items, which may generally otherwise be claimable, through peer-to-peer sites such as Gumtree or even through Facebook groups.
The case, and the lesson to be learned from it, is not so much about the deductibility of work-related expenses, but rather the need to be able to substantiate such deductions — and what may or may not be accepted by the ATO.
The requirements, and the exceptions The legislation provides that to deduct a work expense, the taxpayer needs to substantiate it (if more than $300) by getting “written evidence”. The relevant section sets out the rules relating to written evidence, and provides that the taxpayer must get a document from the supplier that sets out:
the name or business name of the supplierthe amount of the expensethe nature of the goods or servicesthe day the expense was incurred; andthe day it is made out.
There are two exceptions: a) If the document does not show the day the expense was incurred, the taxpayer may use a bank statement or other reasonable, independent evidence that shows when it was paid. b) If the document does not specify the nature of the goods or services, the taxpayer may write in the missing details before lodging their tax return.
There is also further leeway in that the ATO has the discretion to still allow a deduction, if the somewhat stringent conditions listed above are not met, if the nature and quality of evidence available satisfies it that a work expense was incurred and a valid deduction should be allowed. This could include, for example, bank statements, credit card statements, photographs or photocopies of a product or service offered at a particular price (see more details in this practice statement).
The problems with peer-to-peer transactions But let’s get back to the case of the engineer above, or at least to the fact that his purchase was made, allegedly, via the peer-to-peer website Gumtree.
It’s not hard to imagine that there may be many other instances where a buyer agrees to meet a seller at a neutral location such as the local shopping centre (and it’s not uncommon for this to happen, to maintain privacy and/or security) and, given that the transaction is face-to-face and most likely conducted by cash, for none of the expected documentation (from a tax point of view) to exchange hands.
Also, when you think about it, this is not an unusual thing. In many if not most cases, these sellers could be just private citizens getting rid of clutter around their homes, and they are not running a business of selling these items. They therefore will have little interest in drawing up “formal” documents or perhaps even be unwilling to disclose all their personal details. Mostly they’ll be focused on that cash in the buyer’s hand.
For business transactions (the most likely to seek a deduction for such an expense), a taxpayer with an enterprise, or commencing one, may use one of several platforms to buy an asset for work purposes — such as Gumtree, Trading Post or a Facebook Buy-Swap-Sell group for the local area. A taxpayer may also use a platform such as Airtasker to engage someone for a one-off business activity, or perhaps even rent some premises through Airbnb for a few days for business purposes.
For example, imagine a business operator using one of these platforms to:
purchase a second hand domestic lawnmower to commence a gardening businesspurchase a second hand car in good condition to earn money from driving for Uberrent a holiday property to host a weekend yoga retreatpurchase second hand furniture to furnish a home office.
Many vendors on these platforms are not running businesses. They may be individuals who, in their private capacity, wish to sell things they no longer need (like the lawnmower), make some money from renting an unused property on Airbnb, or earn income in their spare time by performing specific tasks (for example someone may advertise on Airtasker than they can assemble flat-packed furniture).
Of course with the online platforms there is always the possibility of keeping tabs of the electronic trail. Some other suggestions are listed below.
Is there a solution? How then can the purchaser ensure that they can substantiate their purchase? Here are a few suggestions that may help the ATO use its discretion to allow a claim. For example:
draw up a document with all the relevant details for the vendor and only ask that they sign itremember that the ATO can accept alternative evidence, so if the seller is unwilling to, say, provide their address, the purchaser and vendor could countersign a document specifying that the transaction took place at a specific location, day and timeif the sale takes place in public, evidence from a related transaction may assist (perhaps a receipt for a coffee or snack bought at the date, time and place of the sale)photo evidence, like a selfie, of the exchange of goods and moneywithdraw the exact or a similar amount from the bank near the time of the transaction so that there is a record on a bank statementkeep a screenshot of the relevant internet advertisement (this is important as most ads are deleted once an item is sold). While this will not conclusively prove that the transaction took place, at least it shows that the item was really offered by the specified vendor at that price in the relevant timeframe.Keep a record (again, screenshots) of messages between purchaser and vendor —such as arranging the meeting time and place, negotiating the purchase of the item, and so forth.
# [business asets], [buy sell online], [eBay], [Facebook], [Gumtree], [peer-to-peer], [tax deductions]
コメント